It is our pleasure here at Green Bored Goobers to introduce our Person of the Week!
Mr. D. Dee a man who’s only claim to fame it seems is that he shares the same initials as a Duck named Daffy. Which we here at Green bored goobers only think is fitting for most of his ideas are, well, daffy as hell. It’s not his fault of course. Mr. Dee is undoubtedly a victim of circumstance. He was raised conservative and was never able to get over it. We also hear he’s a short little guy and has never been able to get over that either. But even as conservative go, and they usually don’t, Mr. Dee is a real piece of work. First off he’s that typical whiny girly man type of conservative who, when they find themselves outclassed by a superior intellectual arguments backed up with little things like facts will, in typical Bill O’Liely fashion, try to shout down the opposition. Failing that, which he always does, his next tactic, right out of the conservative play book, is to have that opposing viewpoint silenced.
Well no more. We will mock and point fingers at Mr. D. Dee’s inane and small minded posts here at Green Bored Goobers to our hearts content.
But where to begin? There was quite a lengthy, but now gone, thread on Global warming. Mr. Dee of course being the card carrying conservative he is was of course a fist class denier. Of course like all deniers he was unable to back up a single one of his arguments with things like facts or evidence. He simply propped up his empty and futile arguments with regurgitated mis-information he had heard on FOX.
However later in the argument he let it slip that AGW might indeed be true but it was too expensive to fix. This would undoubtedly lead to an increase in taxes. So if it was going to actually cost him money out of his own pocket to fix the problem he didn’t want to be bothered by it. Great Humanitarianism there Mr. Dee.
Now before we go on any farther we here at the Green Bored would like to agree with Mr. Dee and that much of the hysteria surrounding Global Warming is misguided and simply muddles the discussion. But to deny that it is occurring and that that human technology is partly responsible for the increase in temperature is foolish at best. To simply counter the argument with childish rants of “it’s a liberal conspiracy” is childish and immature. Of course attacking you with puerile insults on a blog with its comment feature turned off is also immature and childish, but oh so much fun. I’m sure the head on his short little body is going to explode if he ever stumbles across this page.
But to continue on with the show.
His current rant centers around the recent Supreme Court decision to grant Personhood to Corporations. Not surprisingly Mr. Dee is all for it. Which we find rather curious as before he was staunchly against a one world government or having foreign interests dictate policy issues for us here in the States, two things that this latest decision will help to push forward. Already foreign interests are lining up to make large donations to lobbyists
http://thinkprogress.org/2010/01/27/foreign-lobbying-elections/
But this is OK in Mr. Dee’s book because we all know that the only reason Obama got elected was because that evil foreign devil George Soros was able to give millions and millions of dollars to his campaign. Mr. Dee seems to forget that T Boone Pickens donated Two Million dollars to help Swift Boat John Kerry and thus pretty much ensure a second term for Bozo Bush. Thus with abuses on both sides of the aisle wouldn’t it make mores sense to limit and reign in campaign finance than to worsen it by opening the floodgates?
Of course not because like Mr. H. Ugly and Mr. Pear (who we haven introduced as of yet) you are a hypocrite of the first order. You only ever care about an issue if you feel it’s going to benefit you or your side. If you didn’t think that the Republicans could out spend the Democrats in the upcoming elections you’d be whining to high heaven about how unfair this decision was and how it is some sort of Liberal plot to redistribute wealth and impose socialism on the populace. You are so blinded by your knee jerk hatred of Progressive thought that you will abandon any rational thought if you think it will benefit your side. A side that historically has been on the wrong side of most every issue for the last century BTW.
Proof. Easy any argument against your poster child Palin you see as a biased liberal media attack piece. Anything said against her to you is hate speech of the first order. Yet the nearly continual string of vicious and propagandist hate speech that spewed forth from her vile little mouth during and after the campaign goes unchallenged, or even mentioned.
The attacks against Palin are largely a response to these continual (mis)statements. Well that and her stupid assertions of Death Panels and that you can see Russia from her state, the fact that she’s dumb as a post (Whose my Favorite founding Father? All of them!) and can’t even finish a vacation (let alone her elected office of Governor).
But where are our manners. We haven’t completely dismantled and ridiculed one of youe sad and pathetic posts. You wrote:
So the fact that Obama didn't take public funds and could spend all he wanted to smearing McCain and Palin was cool with you? Heck you bought into it for god sake! Odd how it seems to bother you right when the playing field is leveled. As I said you are using hyperbole to make your point and it is dead wrong. It can not happen so now you want to gloss over the fact you were misrepresentnig the facts and move to more scare tactics. Go figure. McCain ran a terrible campaign. No doubt. Obama won based on the fact that if the media treated him like a republican he would have been dead in the water. He had a whole lot of press secretaries masqurading as reporters. Don't admit it I don't really give a hoot, if he was treated for a second the way Bush was he would have folded like a lawn chair. Still would.
So let’s look at the first misstatement. McCain could have chosen not to take public funds as well. No one twisted his arm. McCain made a bad choice and paid the price. This combined with choosing Palin is why he lost the campaign. BTW what you call smearing most of us call campaigning. At least we didn’t see hoards of Klansman wannabees lined up outside the democratic VP candidates appearances waiting to get their sheets signed.
You really need to get over the fact that your side lost.
Your second paragraph is just pathetic. We all know you don’t want a level playing field. Republicans can’t win with a level playing field. They need an unfair advantage like brothers being Governors of Florida, a daddy loaded Supreme Court and a Head of ones election campaign who is also in charge of counting the votes in a pivotal state.
OK, OK that’s all hyperbole. But it’s my blog and I can say whatever I want here. Beside we all know its true :)
Your third paragraph is just sad and reeks of the paranoia so prevalent in conservatives. You seem to continually buy into the Liberal Media Myth. Overlooking the fact that every media outlet is owned by large conservative uber-corporations. It is a well know fact that if Rupert Murdock knew he could make as much money, or more, catering to liberals FOX would be Air America Central. But he knows Liberals are too diverse and intelligent a group to fall for such a ploy (which explains MSNBC’s dismal ratings) so he plays all you conservative idiots for the fools you are. Thus the Obama was treated with kid glove fantasy gets reinforced daily. You seem to completely overlook how the media treated Bush like a golden boy in his two campaigns. Only souring when it was finally revealed that he was the idiot he was by his woeful mismanagement of one and a half wars and our failing economy brought about by his misguided tax cuts and runaway spending.
As for press secretaries masquerading as reporters. Source please. Something other than FOX. Not that there isn’t precedent for this. Bush did it continually during his failed administration. I just never heard it about Obama. But then I don’t watch FOX 24/7 like some people here.
